The American President Impacts the Entire World, So the Entire World Should Have a Say in Choosing the American President
A plea to journalists, politicians, celebrities and activists of all nations to help America choose wisely in 2024. Un-fucking the world begins with un-fucking global media, research and more...
We are Called to Defeat the Big Lies on a Global Scale
These are perilous times for our world because global decision-making is largely based on a long list of entrenched big lies. To get better decision-making, better government and better results, we have to defeat the big lies on a global scale. Electing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the next U.S. President will be a great start. If you’re unaware that RFK Jr. is key to defeating the long list of big lies, you may have much to learn about the propaganda that currently drives our culture.
The American President Impacts Everyone on Earth
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men [sic] are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men [sic], deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…” — United States Declaration of Independence
It’s a foundational American ideal that governments derive their just powers solely from the consent of the governed, and yet, it has become the norm that American Presidents routinely make decisions that profoundly impact people all over the world— people who never get to vote on who becomes the American President. As the effective powers of American Presidents have increased over the years, the situation has become horrifically unjust and it’s time to end it. It’s time to put a wooden stake through the heart of the quaint notion that citizens and nations all around the world should adopt a hands-off, “that’s none of my business” approach to American elections.
The oft-repeated claim that American elections are internal to the United States and that it would be improper for a “foreign” person to try to influence the American election is absurd and grotesque in the context of America as a global superpower/empire.
America’s CIA routinely influences, nay, determines the outcomes of elections around the world and, when they don’t like the outcomes, they have been known to use all manner of “dirty tricks” to achieve regime change against the will of the people in country. Why shouldn’t people in countries whose governments have been impacted by the U.S. get to exert some influence, some serious muscle, in the selection of the American President?
As I write this, President Biden is rumored to be weighing the option of providing long range missiles1 to Ukrainian President Zelensky, which would provide Zelensky the option of striking deep into Russian territory and, potentially, triggering an exchange of nuclear attacks that could quickly escalate into World War III, leaving the planet uninhabitable for all humans. Surely, that’s a decision that all humans should be able to weigh in on.
While we’re on the subject of the war in Ukraine, it’s important to note that in addition to the horrific deaths, destruction and injuries caused to countries involved in the “hot war” aspects of the conflict, there are also plenty of economic impacts to other countries, For example, after getting pulled into observing U.S.-led sanctions against Russia, many European allies have had to pay much more for natural gas and other energy products since they are now barred from buying fuels at lower prices from Russia.
It has recently been revealed that the first people to contract COVID-19 were researchers inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology2 who were developing gain-of-function enhancements on coronaviruses under contract to the United States. Thus, it is now a virtual certainty that the entire COVID-19 pandemic was caused by American research that was deemed too dangerous or illegal to conduct inside the U.S. If that’s not sufficient reason to justify global involvement in the election of the American President, I don’t know what is or even could be.
Free and Open Societies Don’t Exist in a Vacuum— Un-tilting the Electoral Playing Field.
Even if the United States weren’t impacting almost every other nation on Earth in profound ways, the rest of the world still has an interest in democracy and in an international rule-of-law that demands governments be representative of and accountable to their citizens. Where fair elections are not the norm, the global public has a legitimate interest in making a country’s elections fair. In the United States we have a number of institutions that exert biased and un-democratic influences on elections:
Media that kowtow to narratives formulated for them by powerful corporations and government agencies. Such controlled media tend to unfairly attack candidates’ views if they stray from or criticize establishment narratives.
Academics that do “science for hire” to produce research results that support the interests of their sponsors while obscuring or denying more objective public-interest results, especially in the fields of health, medicine and the environment.
Electoral processes that place unfair and undue burdens on candidates that run as independents or third-party nominees.
Political parties that skew the will of their rank-and-file voters with party-appointed “superdelegates”
Electoral processes that give greater weight to voters in rural, lower population states than to voters in more urban, higher population states.
Intelligence agencies and covert “dirty tricks” operatives who sabotage anti-establishment campaigns and/or their candidates.
All these sectors and factors can often make for a tilted playing field in American elections. A world that wants fair elections in the U.S. has a legitimate interest in neutralizing, countering or at least monitoring and reporting on such factors to help ensure the government that takes power in the U.S. is one that is truly supported by the majority of American citizens in a free and open marketplace of ideas.
Amplifying Vox Mundi— The Voice of the World
Thus, we conclude every human being on Earth is at least potentially impacted by decisions taken by the U.S. President and, if any form of ethical consideration still exists in this world, deserves to have input regarding who becomes the so-called “leader of the free world”.
Our next question then is how can people in other countries exert influence on an American election?
Clearly those who aren’t American citizens aren’t eligible to vote in American elections and it’s illegal to contribute to U.S. political campaigns if you’re not an American citizen. Fortunately, while the U.S. Bill of Rights was written to guarantee rights of Americans, it was also most definitely not intended to prevent people of other nations from exercising their own freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, etc. Everyone in the world can say, write and publish what they wish about any subject including political issues and U.S. candidates for President (offer void where prohibited by law3)
Leveling the Journalism and Media Playing Field
In an ideal democracy with a functional fourth estate (free press), candidates compete with each other, mostly by messaging voters through intermediary journalism and professional journalists are ethically bound to represent politicians’ messages accurately, but also critically relative to their culture’s shared consensual reality.
What if, however, the culture’s consensus reality has diverged drastically from actual reality and the majority of voters believe in a fictional world based on propaganda, indoctrination and institutional lies? What if the culture itself is in need of repair, but the media are keeping those repairs from occurring by showing the populace only a fictional version of reality in which things are mostly fine and not in need of drastic changes?
Such a status quo places an unfair burden on a candidate who is trying to not only convince the population his or her policies will fix the problems they’re currently facing, but he also has to convince them that the problems exist in the first place. It is an uphill battle, to say the least.
If for example, your candidate wants to reign in intelligence agencies and make them more accountable to Congress because they’ve assassinated leaders both domestically and abroad, but most people are unaware of such rogue activities and dismiss the allegations as mere “conspiracy theories”, what is a candidate to do?
These are not hypothetical questions. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been accused of spreading many so-called “conspiracy theories” which, upon closer examination, tend to be true.
I list some of these so-called “conspiracy theories” here, and, in so doing, I’m asserting my right to simply assert they’re all true as blithely as the bleating-edge mainstream media chorus currently asserts they are not true— not because I don’t think anyone should have to provide explanations, but because voluminous explanations have already been provided, often for many years running, and I reject the mainstream’s tactical use of demands for explanation, every time a subject is introduced, as a way of preventing conversations from progressing beyond debates of whether X is true and into the rich topics of what to do about X.
JFK was not killed by Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone, but by a conspiracy involving the CIA and organized crime (the “mob”) with the complicity of mainstream media.
RFK was not killed by Sirhan Sirhan, but by a conspiracy involving the federal government and a coverup facilitated by the LAPD, all with the complicity of mainstream media.
Electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and cell phone communications in particular, correlate with increased incidence of tumors and cancer.
A wide range of Endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the environment are known to cause serious reproductive system changes/damage in frogs and other animals. It is probably worth studying if these chemicals might be causing reduced sperm counts or other reproductive system disorders being seen more often in the global human population.
Genetically-targeted bioweapons research and development are being conducted around the world by the various superpowers (and potentially some private groups as well). If COVID-19 affects different genetic groups differently and it was developed in the Wuhan labs (as appears to be the case), it is possible that COVID-19 was the result of some of this research. Further investigation could be beneficial to expose the driving actors behind the research, the agenda(s) of the funding sources and the potential to ban such research with international treaties.
The WTC towers that collapsed on 9/11 were the result of controlled demolition and pre-placed explosives using nanothermite technology, most likely.
Geoengineering programs are introducing too much aluminum into our soils and water supplies and cannot mask global warming caused by fossil fuels consumption indefinitely.
Enough perpetrators of mass shootings in America have had known mental health problems and were either using SSRIs or had recently changed or stopped their dosage levels with SSRIs that it seems only prudent to investigate whether SSRIs are a driving factor in the mass shooting epidemic.
COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy is much more risky than is popularly acknowledged and appears to be the most likely explanation for increases in “deaths from all causes” seen in many populations and demographics around the world.
Ivermectin (IVM) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been shown to be safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 in many clinical practices and trials but the facts have been actively suppressed by big pharma interests because the existence of safe and effective treatments would have prevented the issuance of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy shots (popularly called “vaccines”).
Ukraine is losing the proxy war with Russia, which was provoked by NATO encroachment and U.S. interventions to bring about the 2014 color revolution in Ukraine.
Of course this is not a complete list and I don’t claim to have precisely captured RFK Jr’s positions on all of these issues. I’ve studied many of these issues myself for many years and am familiar with many of the same sources Kennedy has doubtless come across.
The challenge for international journalists is to investigate these issues more deeply than U.S. journalists have so far and then report their findings. If the U.S. media’s use of the label “conspiracy theory” is more political than factual in nature, the world needs to hear it. Besides, these issues don’t just impact America, they impact the world as whole, at least indirectly if not directly.
It is only by revealing truths that replace official lies and exposing the truths behind much of what establishment media call “conspiracy theories” that we can create the level political playing field that is necessary for fair competition between candidates for political office. There are many subjects that require deep-dives for journalists and many suppressed truths that will strain credibility unless journalists of high repute are willing to expend some of their credibility-capital to bring these stories to light.
International Elections Observers (Leveling the Elections Field)
Perhaps the most important prerequisite for a level political playing field is secure and verifiable balloting and election systems.
U.S. election systems are a patchwork of technologies ranging from hackable e-voting systems with and without paper trails, paper ballots that are optically scanned and probably still some punched cards and other arcane balloting systems. For the most part, they are not, in their present form, possible to verify adequately and there have been indications for years that official results diverge from exit polling by 5%-10% or more. News pundits always report this divergence as proof that the exit polls are wrong, but there’s no proof as to whether it’s the exit polls or official results that are wrong. Statistics suggest it’s probable the official results are off.
Unfortunately, there’s not much we can do to change these election systems before November 2024. In fact, it will probably take the very political revolution that has been suppressed by rigged election equipment for a few decades to get to a place where we have elections that are verifiable enough to get the political revolution needed to get verifiable elections in the first place. It’s a chicken-and-egg problem.
One thing we do know, however, is that exit polls, properly done are typically within about one-tenth of 1% of the actual vote, if that vote is recorded and counted accurately. Unfortunately, exit polls in the U.S. are not consistently done and are almost always done by the same company that is jointly owned by the top six media corporations and which typically adjusts their exit poll results to match the official counts before reporting results to news organizations where they are used not to confirm the accuracy of the official counts, but to generate tons of content about which candidates were preferred by old, young, black, white, male, female, soccer mom and/or angry young man voters— aka “fluff pieces”.
America needs a large-scale international exit polling effort to detect and report on election rigging and, if we’re lucky, perhaps deter enough of the rigging to prevent the 2024 election from being stolen. The author is not a 2020 election conspiracy theorist, but is, rather a student of the 2000 and 2004 elections and their exit polls which indicated massive shenanigans in favor of Republican candidates. The author doesn’t care to argue here about which elections were or were not stolen, but only seeks to unite everyone who has questioned the official results to help push for truly verifiable and accurate elections with hand-marked paper ballots nationwide.
Who are the biggest international newspapers, magazines, academic organizations, television and social media companies that might help make such exit polling a reality?
Buycott/Joycott (leveling the Economic playing field)
Since access to more campaign donations is often a decisive advantage for political campaigns, in a democracy it would be ideal if all voters had comparable personal resources to draw from to support their preferred candidates. This is far from the case in America.4 Wealth in America is now stratified to a degree unseen since prior to the Great Depression and the BBC reports that the American political system functions more as an oligarchy than a democracy5. Perhaps, in indirect ways, the international community can help businesspeople in America who support political change that is more aligned with global interests and needs.
It’s a global economy now. Gone are the days when America was so much wealthier than the rest of the world that foreign commerce had negligible influence on American business.
The upshot, put simply, is that anyone in the world can do business with people in America and they can choose to support people and businesses that are aligned with their values. One can buy books from authors who tell the stories they support and want to help spread. One can support journalists whose reportage aligns with their own views about what’s important. One can research the political giving history of business owners they’re considering doing business with and choose to work with suppliers they share views and values with. One can buy music and other entertainment from artists whose messages and politics resonate with their own.
If enough people internationally choose to work and do business with Americans who share their values, there will certainly be secondary effects, some of which would likely be more and continuing political support for the kinds of political campaigns they’ve supported previously. Of course, there cannot be any “quid quo pro” arrangements or guarantees that any particular business deal would result in benefits to any particular political campaign. All one can do is choose to support good businesses and hope they do good things as they prosper.
Whistleblowing (leveling the secrecy vs. transparency playing field)
To paraphrase John 8:32, “We shall know the truth and the truth shall make us free.” It’s difficult to measure the profound benefits that whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange and others have given to humanity. They have exposed deep corruption in our government and reset government credibility levels to some of the lowest levels ever (as it should be until such time as our trust is again earned). But that work is far, far from done and many more lies will need to be exposed before we root out corruption enough to build a society with integrity.
Imagine it’s 1972 and you are the famous “Deep Throat” source for Woodward and Bernstein’s Watergate reporting or one of the other Watergate insiders who knew the details by July 1972 and could have leaked the info before the 1972 election in November— but didn’t. You end up living with the knowledge that you caused Nixon to be re-elected and George McGovern, a truly progressive Democrat who wanted to end the Vietnam War immediately among many other progressive goals, to lose the election and never become President.
Now imagine you had some very serious regrets about that decision to delay leaking the story and, late in life, you’re offered an opportunity to time-travel back to the Summer of 1972 and re-live several months of your life. Would you leak the information sooner? Would you prevent Nixon from being re-elected? Would McGovern’s Presidency have been a golden age for America?
Now, let’s suppose that you— you sitting here reading this right now— are, in fact, a time-travelling knock-off of yourself from fifty years in the future— 2073— who has seen how the world turned out when people didn’t tell the world what they knew soon enough to make a difference. What do you know right now that you might wish you’d uploaded to Wikileaks today? Who are some other people whose secrets need to come out today to make the coming fifty years better than they’d otherwise turn out to be? Perhaps you can guess the answers to these questions. Perhaps you can get the info out today. Perhaps you can convince others to do the same.
Regardless of what secrets we know or don’t know, we should all look at the present day as if we were time-travelling versions of ourselves who’ve come back for a do-over in which we are braver, more forthcoming and quicker-to-the-punch versions of ourselves than we’re accustomed to being. It’s just that we can’t yet know how deeply, vitally important our contributions to this timeline might be.
Perhaps you have a copy of Epstein’s safe’s videos and financial records. Perhaps you have information about which countries might have bought nuclear secrets from Trump. Perhaps you have the contents of Hunter’s laptop. Maybe it’s simply proof of other corrupt business or government dealings.
Whatever it is, leak it now.
Intelligence (leveling the cloak-and-dagger playing field)
It’s so cliche’ that it must be true. In so many spy movies, they find out there’s an assassination plot to kill the legitimate or soon-to-be leader of a country and they manage to follow up all the leads just in time, make a daring ploy and save the life of the leader and foil the assassins’ plans. The assassins are then captured and jailed and the spies, in true western hero style, enjoy the eternal gratitude of everyone in the country even though their identities are never revealed so they are able to continue doing good spy work for as long as they want to.
I don’t know if it would work out with such a happy ending in real life, but if there is a plot or an attempt on a certain candidate’s life in the 2024 election season that you are able to thwart, you’ll have my eternal gratitude whether you’re a U.S. or foreign agent.
Be the secret agent of change you want to see in the world.
And, for God’s sake exert the maximum international pressure to get the Biden administration to finally approve Secret Service protection for Kennedy. This country owes the Kennedy family at least that much. The denial of protections is one of the most reprehensible omissions imaginable, given the family history and the high stakes of this election.
Conclusion
The rest of the world might not be allowed to play on the field of the 2024 U.S. Presidential elections, but they/you don’t have to just sit on the sidelines either. If American politics, elections, media, academia, etc. were a big foosball table, it would be tipped at a rakish angle so the mini soccer ball always scores goals for the establishment’s team. We can help change that. We can help level the playing field in a number of ways so the election is based on real issues, running real candidates and counting real ballots. We can help direct attention to the issues, candidates and scoundrels that need to be seen by everyone so a wise decision is made.
Robert F. Kennedy might not be a perfect candidate, but he’s the closest we’ve got and he’s far superior to any other 2024 candidate or any candidate we’ve seen on the national stage (or global stage) in a couple of decades. The only problem is Americans’ mis-informed culture that makes it so many U.S. voters don’t know that what others call RFK Jr’s “crazy talk” is actually true. U.S. voters don’t know shit from shinola, so we have to teach them. That’s a big job— global in scale.
We have an opportunity to un-fuck the world in 2024. Let’s make the most of it.
Get involved at https://www.kennedy24.com/martintruther
Disclaimer: Author is not an attorney in the U.S. or any other country. When in doubt, consult legal counsel in your own jurisdiction/country.
Wealth Inequality in America (youtube.com)
Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy - BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
The country with the most influence on US elections is Israel. Or maybe Russia has more quiet influence than we know. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q Based on Nordstream, Germany might have some good reasons to do what it can to remove Biden.
The big problem is that these other countries don't have democracy either, and it's the PEOPLE of the world, not their governments, who will benefit from an RFK presidency.